🔗 Share this article

A collective of individuals affected by the state-led suppression amid the 2022 "Women, Life, Freedom" protests has launched a landmark judicial filing accusing numerous identified Iranian figures of alleged crimes against humanity.

Case Filing Launched in Argentina

The application for a legal inquiry to be commenced was filed within the Argentine courts. This step was made by a collective of Iranian nationals aided by a human rights legal group. The Argentinian legal framework are particularly open to accepting cases based on universal jurisdiction.

The filing asserts that the response from Iranian authorities to the unrest included "firing live ammunition, non-lethal projectiles, steel shot improperly used for crowd control, and various objects at protesters." The document further states mass arrests, custodial torture, and killings of individuals that allegedly persist to this day.

Confidential Names

Certain agents from within the spectrum of Iran's intelligence apparatus have been listed in the complaint, but their personal details are currently being kept confidential.

Victim Testimonies Drive the Case

One of the individuals behind the case, based in Britain Mahsa Piraei, stated that the objective "is far from personal vengeance in a private capacity, but justice and truth." Her parent, Minoo Majidi, aged 62, was fatally shot in the autumn of 2022. Autopsy reports revealed in excess of 167 steel projectiles had been shot at her back at extremely close proximity. She had been on a street protest concerning the demise of Mahsa Amini, a young Kurdish woman who was killed while detained.

Piraei, one of Majidi's three offspring, was living abroad at the moment of her parent's brutal death. She went back to Iran at considerable peril to visit her grave. Her sibling Roya shared a picture of herself by their mother's grave with her head shorn on a restricted social media account. A contact circulated the photo, which spread widely, subsequently forcing Roya to flee for Turkey.

Piraei stated: "Through court documents and documentation the goal is to maintain records, identify offenses and avoid historical oblivion." She characterized her loss as "not an isolated incident but part of a systematic practice."

Further Claimants Consist of Victims of Blinding

The additional claimants who are named are Kowsar Eftekhari and Mersedeh Shahinkar, both individuals who suffered loss of sight at close range by paintball guns.

Eftekhari, a young scholar, was shot in the face in late 2022. She had been demonstrating for weeks, seeing fellow protesters being struck by bullets and being beaten herself with shock weapons. During a protest on 12 October, she was at a demonstration near a educational institution when a plainclothes officer fired at her with numerous projectiles from a distance of about a meter. He then allegedly fired at her eye when she did not respond to his demand to leave. A video of the assault with blood pouring from her eye went viral, and she was eventually offered protection in Germany.

Shahinkar, 38 at the time when attacked on October 18th, only understood what had happened when she noticed something unusual on her cheek. Fellow protesters cautioned her not to get into an emergency vehicle for fear of being taken to a authority holding area. When she finally got to a health center, a employee ordered her to depart because they refused to assist demonstrators. A physician examined her and directed her to a hospital, where Shahinkar claimed a object had inadvertently injured her vision so she would not be turned away. She published photos of her condition online, and in January 2023, undercover agents confronted her, prompting her to flee Iran. She later was awarded a notable international award as a representative of the campaign.

Global Legal Concept Offers Foundation for Case

The group pursuing the inquiry assert that the case is not seen just as a legal complaint with slim prospect of a practical outcome. The concept permits allegations to be examined in a different state even if the violation did not happen in that jurisdiction and the accused is not resident there. The Argentinian system has particularly permissive regulations on such cases in the world.

The doctrine of international justice has in the past led to dozens of sentences and the launch of prosecutions regarding violations committed in many countries. Proceedings are currently being pursued in several different countries.

As the request is solely for a legal inquiry, and this is not a case for damages, there is no claim by the complainants for monetary compensation. This complaint would not constitute the first instance against Iranian officials initiated in Argentina.