🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.